Vote totals:
Yes:
0%
No:
100%
Neutral:
0%
DEBATE: THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
The National Curriculum is the product of a factory system designed for a world that no longer exists.
Mainstream schooling in Britain was designed to create a compliant, obedient workforce for the factories. It is overly dependent on strict subject delineation and is now over-crowded with subjects.
This form of schooling has been edited out over the years as the Industrial Revolution turns to the Technical Revolution. No longer are we taught our sums ‘parrot-fashion’, discipline has transformed from corporal punishment, dealt out to the criminals who originally went there, to much more lenient yet effective punishments, and the system allows for an all-round, effective education in many subjects.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
The National Curriculum does not provide personalised learning since it is an instrument of mass instruction.
The scale of student numbers eliminates the possibility for true personalised learning. Students are increasingly disengaged from the learning process as they come to regard it as irrelevant to them. The silent majority get by by keeping a low profile.
The education system has only limited resources. Without a ridiculous small ratio of teachers to pupils, a system that teaches a broad range of basic skills to everyone is the only option, and hiring lots of teachers is impossible, dependent on higher taxes and having a wealth of adequate teachers available. Neither of these conditions will be met, so a general system as we have already is the best option.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
The National Curriculum has stifled creativity (the generation of ideas) and innovation (the addition of value).
Strict adherence to command and control school management and subject areas of teaching has limited opportunities to explore the art and skills of thinking. Students may know but do not understand. The essence of learning – to ask questions and make personal sense of the world – has been taken away.
Having a national curriculum merely standardises what is taught across the country, giving equal opportunity to all. It doesn’t mandate that every teacher uses the same approach in the classroom; this is an argument against bad teachers, not the national curriculum.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
Local variations
The national curriculum does not allow for enough local variation. It is import for children to learn the values of things such as local history, accents and dialects. We are not all the same and school should reflect that.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
The national curriculum is capable of substantial improvement
The present problem is that the curriculum is too comprehensive. It tries to squeeze all children into the same mould.
We need a more flexible policy to allow for individual aptitudes and interests. However there should still be a more limited core curriculum. Maths and English are essential to enable us to function in modern society. Schools should be required to ensure the hoghest possible standards in these subjects. Then they should be encouraged to offer any other subjects which the pupils and their parents want. If the school successfully imparts the motivation to learn, the particular subjects they study are much less important.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
The National Curriculum provides reference points of achievement for parents and government.
The Blair/Brown government is obsessed with targets, though their effectiveness seems marginal to say the least.
‘Staging posts’ of success within the National Curriculum provide benchmarks which inform policy decisions.
THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM SHOULD BE SCRAPPED.
The National Curriculum measures standards.
The problem is that parents don’t want to send smart kids to bad schools, so any problem identified by the standards will likely lead to fewer and fewer good children going and the school sliding down even further.
Parents and policy-makers can use the data from national measurements to provide frameworks for improvement strategies. Standardisation offers targets against which poorer-performing schools can set themselves.
This is all a bit of a muddle; some of the 'for' points argue for the NC, some of them argue against it...