Vote totals:
Yes:
0%
No:
100%
Neutral:
0%
DEBATE: SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
English children are held back due to odd spellings
A very motivated foreign student, with a natural aptitude for learning languages, can learn English, on average, in six months if studying for twenty-one hours a week!(1) Imagine how long and difficult this process is for our young children of Britain. We have all been there and some picked it up better than others. Others still struggle. John Wells believes that children are being held back due to irregular spelling and learning how to use the apostrophe. John Wells was quoted in The Times (September 8th, 2008): "It seems to be a great pity that English-speaking countries are holding back children in this way. In Finnish, once you have learned the letters, you know how to spell, so it would be ludicrous to hold spelling tests. In countries like Italy and Spain it’s similar. But with English it’s not phonetic, and there are just so many irregularities."(2) It does logically make sense for British spelling to be changed to a phonetic system for the sake of the young.
(1) http://www.englishschool.org.uk/
(2) http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article4698949.ece
However, other English speaking countries have similar school systems, so perhaps we should not be blaming the English language and look to teaching methods that may be creating the real problem. Similarly, phonetics is not the only or best way to learn how to spell – other methods are available such as the ‘look-say’ method.
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
It would save money
Imagine how much money is being spent on extra learning for students struggling with reading and writing. If they did not struggle, such expense would be unnecessary. It would also create a knock-on effect, with students then doing badly in other subjects, such as history, science and geography etc. Many business companies throw CV’s away because the spelling content is poor – thus losing individuals who could be an asset to their company. At present 20% of adults in Britain cannot read and write easily – a much larger number than in countries like Sweden that have easier spelling systems(1). In turn, this then leads to adults also having difficult grasping the English language and holding our economy back. At present 20% of adults in Britain cannot read and write easily – a much larger number than in countries like Sweden that have easier spelling systems.
(1) http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=800
Student support teachers play a vital role in many schools across the country – assisting children to read and write more easily. Without the need for this role, their jobs would be lost.
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
It would not be too difficult
Despite the opinions of some, all it would need was some Government strength of mind to change the current English language to follow the phonetic system. This need only be proved by history: in the last forty years, Britain changed its currency from the traditional pounds, shillings and pence, to the modern system of one hundred pennies to the pound. The old imperial system of measurements was changed to the simpler modern metric system. If we all put our minds too it, it would not be so difficult to change to the new phonetic language.
It would have been very difficult for children to learn these new systems during mathematics. This is proved particularly by the fact that many people do still use the imperial system of measurements in fabric stores etc, despite the metric system being introduced.
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
Unfairness towards dyslexic people and those who have never been good at spelling
Those students who have had to stay behind after English lessons for help with their literacy are often branded unfair, cruel names, such as ‘thick’ and ‘stupid’. Student support teachers often sit with those struggling to keep up and understand during lessons. A prime example would be my father: a very intelligent, capable man who never could quite grasp how to spell and can now often be found asking for my sister or myself to spell words for him, so as to avoid embarrassment. Perhaps by using phonetics, people like him could be helped. Those suffering from dyslexia find spelling so difficult, maybe it is our job to step in and make it easier.
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
Phonetics has already infiltrated Britain
Hi. Wot r u up 2? Out 2nite? Gr8 c u l8r.
Teenagers of Britain are already masters of the phonetic language: they have infiltrated text messages, online chat and public profiling. Perhaps it is just lazy, but it is the way Britain is moving and maybe even the way forward.
From personal experience, members of my family have often asked me to translate text messages for them. The majority of older members of our generation will never be able to understand the phonetic language – particularly the complex one used by teenagers. I am still struggling to teach my grandmother to open a text message, let alone read one riddled with today’s ‘text language’!
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
The English language links us to our culture
English is a hugely rich language comprised of around three quarters of a million words(1). Many words link back to history; such as the French culture of Norman invaders, to the Latin of the Christian church. For example, the word ‘Wednesday’ is not a phonetic spelling, but it originated from Woden, the Anglo-Saxon god. Using phonetics, such links would be thrown away and truly wasted.
(1) http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutenglish/numberwords?view=uk
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
The cost of change would be massive
It would have to be weighed up between how much money could potentially by saved by the new system to the cost of how much it would amount to do this. It indicates that it would be more expensive to the world than how much it would save.
All in all, when you sit and work out the cost of changing the English language to that of phonetics, the expense would be extensive. Millions of books would have to be changed to accommodate the new language. Computers and websites would have to be translated. The cost of re-educating millions of people around the world would be enormous. Is it really worth it because children are struggling to use the apostrophe?
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
Who makes the decision?
The foundation of the English language was first built when the Anglos, Saxons, and Jutes came to England. Does it then make it the responsibility of the British Government to decide whether it should be changed? How about the USA – they are the largest and richest country that speak English. On the other hand, India has the biggest number of people with English as their second language. Does anyone have claim?
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
Trying to change the language would bring up barriers between people with different accents
The transfer to a phonetic system will create barriers between counties and, in turn, countries. Different people from different places will always and have always pronounced things differently. It is these strange and diverse accents that make us all individual. Elaine Higgleton, editorial director for Collins Language was quoted in The Times (September 8th, 2008): “Would we continue spelling the word think with a ‘th’ because that is how some of us pronounce it, or would it be spelled ‘fink’ as it is in the East End of London or ‘tink’ as in Ireland?”. Changing to a phonetic system would merely push one small groups’ pronunciation on us all.
SHOULD BRITISH SPELLING BE CHANGED TO FOLLOW A PHONETIC SYSTEM?
English is the second most widely spoken language in the world
Surely so many people speak English because they are brought up to do so – for example, the USA is a very big country with English as its’ first language and they therefore have very little choice. In turn, more people are likely to learn the difficult language because so many others already do.
514,000,000 human beings speak English(1), the second most spoken language in the world, following Chinese (Mandarin). Imagine trying to teach all those people the new phonetic language. And would they even attempt to do so? If it was that difficult, then surely this many people would not be able to fluently speak and write English.
(1) http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0775272.html