Modified:
11 Oct 2008
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

33%

No:

33%

Neutral:

33%

 
Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe to Debate

Join Mailing List

Key Links

Debatewise debate DEBATE: SHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?

Can an ever increasing human population support the agricultural status quo and continue to dedicate massive resources toward the support of farm animals without significantly destroying what is left of the world’s wildlands? Also are the ethical arguments concerning global food distribution and animal welfare (especially concerning factory farming) strong enough to reform the way people view their diets and where their food comes from? How shall we feed ourselves in the 21st Century when the Earth's population is likely to be 9 billion by 2050?





Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


The current livestock situation is unsustainable


The director for the Centre for Global Food Issues stated that the world must "create five billions vegans in the next several decades, or triple its total farm output without using more land". The point being that livestock population is 21 billion, this is 3 and a half times the human population. Rearing livestock takes up two-thirds of agricultural land, and one third of the total land area. There is enough food in the world in order to feed all the humans in the world. The World’s bread basket, the US, uses 60% of its grain to feed livestock. 800 million people go hungry since so much grain is dedicated toward livestock.
Everyone who is reading this, is very likely never to have had faced true hunger, of not having the resources to find enough food for a sustained period of time, nor the effects of undernourishment (neither has the author). Neither do people realise how dizzyingly high the number 800 million really is.



Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


We must conserve the earth


In the next few centuries, with an exponentially growing human population, the creatures of which we are most directly aware – rhinos, tigers, cheetahs, bears, camels, antelope, deer, koalas, kangaroos – don’t have a prayer without a real conservation plan. The human activity which affects the planet most is food production. The main charges that would increase both human’s own security and leave more room for fellow species is the production of less livestock: producing mega quantities of grain and pulses specifically to feed livestock. The true ecological niche of livestock is to eat things that human beings cannot eat and to live in areas which people cannot inhabit.
Enough food is being produced to feed every single person on earth. However the systems of distribution are not based with the aim of feeding the earth, but were constructed by demand and profit. Thus food distribution is vastly unequal. Ploughing through the amazon rainforest for soya which is distributed round USA and Europe (and provides for 75% of Europe’s farm animal feed) by companies such as Cargill (which is the largest private company in the world) means that eating meat spearheds the destruction of natural habitat and is the biggest threat to the world’s biodiversity…hunting is a problem concerning large mammals and reptiles, and doesnt have the legal backing of the international community which, unofortunately, the industrial farming business does, and is far more a structural problem and far more potent a problem.

Yes, conservation is important, but livestock alone are not causing species extinction. The species listed opposite have been driven clost to extinction through human destruction of their habitat; but for living space, crops and natural resources like wood as well as grazing space for livestock. Hunting has also been an important factor for some species; but for sport, not food. If everyone switched to a vegan diet we would only start using more land for crop production for human consumption; that won’t bring these species back.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


It will facilitate world food distribution


Agricultural systems are not there to feed people. Western agriculture is designed in the end to maximise profit. A host of security problems such as poverty, famine, war, and corruption are rooted in the underlying problem that there is an unequal access to food. Western lifestyles, which are the particular beneficiaries of this system – and diet in particular – can play a large part in depriving the world’s poor of much needed food.

A vegan diet is not going to singlehandedly destroy capitalism; whether the food products in question are animal or vegetable, they will still be traded for profit.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


Prevention of Animal Cruelty: The Killing Fields


The meat and dairy industry also primarily exist for profit. However their commodities are animals which are treated in an appalling manner in order to churn out the most product- the meat these animals provide as well as their by products: milk, eggs, wool, skin and whatever other remains may be used in other industries.
The welfare provided for the animals is minimal; farm animals suffer a lot in their lives in order to produce the tremendous and unnatural amount of produce which they are forced to give.
Animals which produce foods are manipulated in such a way that they work on a maximum rate of production to their expense. Chickens are a well known example in the UK, with a popular consumer movement encouraging the use of free range eggs.
Common conditions for many factory animals include filthy and cramped conditions; enough to kill many who can’t cope, injection of drugs in order to increase growth rapidly which can resulting bodily deformations as well as mortal illness.
Those animals that are designated to breed are artificially inseminated regularly and have their young taken away prematurely before being impregnated again.
Forcible mutilation is another necessity. For example, piglets and chickens have their teeth clipped and parts of beaks removed without anaesthetic.
Slaughter is not a painless event. 9.5 million pigs were slaughtered in the UK alone in 2007 through stunning, being shackled upside down, and then having their throats slit. It is the sticking (slitting of the throat) which kills the pig, not the stunning, and there are many instances of the pig still being conscious whilst they are being sticked.
‘Mad Cow Disease’ (vCJD) came about through a cost cutting expenditure, as cattle were fed neuron tissue from sheep and other cattle. It is blinkered to ignore the fact that the meat and dairy products that are consumed in restaurants, fast food chains and supermarkets comes from somewhere which we might not like. The only way to provide such cheap meat at such an enormous quantity (the shelves never run low) is to make production cheap which is at the suffering of the animals that are born, reared, transported and slaughtered in miserable conditions for our priveliged lifestyle.

The idea of stunning an animal before slaughter is to render it paralysed and unconscious while the killing takes place. We cannot be 100% that it is an entirely painless experience, and probably there are occasional mistakes made, since the process in repeated hundreds of times a day. But the experienced professionals who slaughter animals use their skills to make it as clean a job as possible.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


Prevent Global Warming


Reducing the demand for meat and dairy products is an effective method for tackling climate change.
The rearing of cattle and other animals gives huge carbon emissions and is the driving force for virtually every major category of environmental destruction; deforestation, soil erosion, water scarcity, water and air pollution, and biodiversity loss. The production of meat and dairy itself is responsible for almost a fifth of global greenhouse emissions, and as meat consumption is set to double by the middle of the century, it is only going to be more destructive.



Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


Our bodies were not designed for a vegan diet


It is true that humans around the world have evolved whilst consuming meat and dairy food products. It does not follow from this statement that a vegan diet is automatically unnatural or unhealthy.
All diets must be planned carefully to which there is no exception, A managed vegan diet meets all nutritional standards.
Many people in the UK are undernourished because they do not pay attention to what they eat, over indulging on processed food which is not only lacking nutritionally but also contains many harmful agents which accumulate in the body. Badly managed vegan diets may result in poor health just the same as any diet.
Vitamin B12, Vitamin D are nutritional requirements that are naturally provided by meat and dairy products and can easily be taken through fortified breakfast cereals, soya milk, or vitamin supplements.
Nutrients such as calcium, iron, and protein (including all the essential amino acids) can all be found through plant sources.
It would be foolish to generalize that all people can be healthy with a vegan diet. Children have smaller appetites and need meat and dairy to meet sufficient nutritional requirements. Others do not have the range of food necessary available to them. It is still overwhelming however how much over-consumption there is of dairy and meat products and a vegan diet poses no danger for those who wish to take an ethical step to help prevent the inexorable food crisis this planet will be entering into this century.

Humans evolved as meat eaters; we need essential nutrients such as proteins and iron to be healthy. It is true that these can be obtained from vegetable sources, but not as efficiently, and a vegan diet can easily lead to deficiencies without careful management. Currently the ‘Western diet’ does contain too many animal products, especially fats, and we would all benefit from replacing some of these with vegetable based foodstuffs. But we should be looking to consume meat in moderation, not rule it out entirely. Eating fewer animal products would solve a lot of the problems highlighted by this debate; but eradicating it from our diets entirely could cause health problems and is simply not necessary.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debateSHOULD THE WORLD GO VEGAN?


Meat consumption should be reduced, but does NOT need to be eradicated


All the arguments above focus on the problems that arise from mass production of animal products; intensive farming, factory animals, mass slaughter. For all of these reasons, and for our general good health, we should consider reducing the amount of meat in our diet. If we all ate a smaller amount of organic, locally produced meat, then we could still enjoy a diverse diet without having such a negative impact on the environment.
It is up to consumers to demand good quality products, rather than high volume at a low price.




Vote on the overall debate: Should the world go Vegan?

What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Comments about this debate

There are no comments for this debate


Add your own comment

Login or register to leave a comment
Loading...