Vote totals:
Yes:
100%
No:
0%
Neutral:
0%
DEBATE: UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
There is no feedback on examined work.
Feedback is only given on (optional) coursework that does not contribute to final mark.
Once the exams are taken, feedback would not be useful, as the grades have been decided and you cannot do anything or change anything to alter your grades.
UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
You cannot question an academic judgement, only administrative error.
Grounds of appeal are, ‘extenuating circumstance’ (eg. death in family) at the time the exam was taken, or possible ‘administrative error’.
UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
There is no physical evidence to verify correct allocation of mark to student
No mark is made on the manuscript, only in a spreadsheet. If you question the allocated mark on ‘administrative error’ grounds – it cannot be verified whether the is indeed yours as there is nothing on the original peice of work.
UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
Exam mark allocations can be verified by inspection of the master spreadsheet.
No they cannot. Entry into a spreadsheet is prone to error, and even then does not link exam mark to manuscript (with no mark on it).
UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
The exam papers are marked by both an internal and an external marker.
Agreed, but these have to be manually entered into a spreadsheet at a later date and this is open to human error. Cannot be checked at a later date as there is nothing written onto the manuscript.
UNIVERSITY EXAM MARKING IS FLAWED, AND NOT TRANSPARENT.
Feedback is given on coursework, not examined work.
I fail to see the educational benefit to be gained from no comment on your final work. Best of all, this allows for no accountability or traceability on the part of the university who does not have to justify why you have been allocated the mark.