Modified:
27 Nov 2008
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

0%

No:

0%

Neutral:

100%

 
Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe to Debate

Join Mailing List

Key Links

Debatewise debate DEBATE: PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY

When the invention of photography was announced in Paris in 1839, the artist Paul Delaroche stated that, “from today, painting is dead”. 169 years of painting since that time have proved Delaroche wrong however the initial announcement did change the way painters approached their art. They moved away from realism and evolved new ways of looking at the world – Impressionism, Cubism and Surrealism to name a few. In Modernism the subject was dropped completely and painting became all about the ideology of the aesthetic and the autonomy of the painted surface. Photography was now the purveyor of truth and painting was just the old man at the end of bar who stories may be listened to but are never believed. But what of photography? It may have become the primary visual currency within society, but how objective and transparent is this magical medium, and is it really even art?





Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


The Skill


Painterly skill shows how gifted mankind can be. It is in itself an expression of our humanity; there is something of the artist in it as well as the subject.

Photography shows how far mankind has come. A far cry from painting on cave walls with a stick and animal blood, humans have created a machine that captures life as it happens. Furthermore, vast amounts of digital software – as well as traditional darkroom techniques – have been developed to add further artistic flair to the images they capture.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


The Inspiration Factor


We are not awe inspired by photography in the same way we are by the Mona Lisa or the Sistine chapel

One person’s preference does not stand for everyone else on the planet.
Many people prefer photography to paintings, or like them similarly, or like neither.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


More than just Vision


Paintings can tell us more about our nature as human beings than the literal visual world shown in photographs

Hyper-realistic paintings aim to reproduce life as accurately as possible.
Movements such as Pictorialism, in the area of photography, aimed to bring it firmly into the category of ‘art’. A wide variety of techniques were employed, from extensive use of filters to etching prints with fine needles, in order to make the resultant images resemble sumptuous oil paintings.
A photograph can be taken in an instant – a painting can take years to finish. A lucky, candid shot can reveal more about a person’s inner self than they even realised themselves, whereas a posed portrait will simply show the angle they want the world to see.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


What about the Technology?


Photographic technology shows how ingenious mankind can be…



Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


What about the Accessibility?


Painting is much cheaper – compare the prices of wash-tint plus paper with a photo camera plus accessories. Professional painting equipment is also cheaper than high-tech cameras.
Without electricity (e.g. in the middle of the jungle), photography is not accessible. Analogue photography also requires photo labs.
Everyone is able to paint – its quality differs from person to person but the case is similar with photography.

Photography is more accessible than painting – cheaper, quicker, and able to be made by all


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


What about the Truth?


Photography is a segment reality from a certain aspect via determined access – i.e., how a photographer sees the world and how her machine is able to represent it. In question of truth it does not differ essentially from painting.

Photography is truth – it shows us what was really there at a specific time


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Debatewise debatePAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY


A cross-section of the community


More people can capture a recognisable image using a camera than by creating a painting. Therefore, photographs can reflect the ideas and opinions of many more demographics than painting. Consequently, it is true to say that photography is better at representing mankind as a whole.




Vote on the overall debate: Painting represents mankind better than Photography

What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Comments about this debate

There are no comments for this debate


Add your own comment

Login or register to leave a comment
Loading...