Vote totals:
Yes:
0%
No:
0%
Neutral:
100%
DEBATE: PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
The Skill
Painterly skill shows how gifted mankind can be. It is in itself an expression of our humanity; there is something of the artist in it as well as the subject.
Photography shows how far mankind has come. A far cry from painting on cave walls with a stick and animal blood, humans have created a machine that captures life as it happens. Furthermore, vast amounts of digital software – as well as traditional darkroom techniques – have been developed to add further artistic flair to the images they capture.
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
The Inspiration Factor
We are not awe inspired by photography in the same way we are by the Mona Lisa or the Sistine chapel
One person’s preference does not stand for everyone else on the planet.
Many people prefer photography to paintings, or like them similarly, or like neither.
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
More than just Vision
Paintings can tell us more about our nature as human beings than the literal visual world shown in photographs
Hyper-realistic paintings aim to reproduce life as accurately as possible.
Movements such as Pictorialism, in the area of photography, aimed to bring it firmly into the category of ‘art’. A wide variety of techniques were employed, from extensive use of filters to etching prints with fine needles, in order to make the resultant images resemble sumptuous oil paintings.
A photograph can be taken in an instant – a painting can take years to finish. A lucky, candid shot can reveal more about a person’s inner self than they even realised themselves, whereas a posed portrait will simply show the angle they want the world to see.
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
What about the Technology?
Photographic technology shows how ingenious mankind can be…
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
What about the Accessibility?
Painting is much cheaper – compare the prices of wash-tint plus paper with a photo camera plus accessories. Professional painting equipment is also cheaper than high-tech cameras.
Without electricity (e.g. in the middle of the jungle), photography is not accessible. Analogue photography also requires photo labs.
Everyone is able to paint – its quality differs from person to person but the case is similar with photography.
Photography is more accessible than painting – cheaper, quicker, and able to be made by all
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
What about the Truth?
Photography is a segment reality from a certain aspect via determined access – i.e., how a photographer sees the world and how her machine is able to represent it. In question of truth it does not differ essentially from painting.
Photography is truth – it shows us what was really there at a specific time
PAINTING REPRESENTS MANKIND BETTER THAN PHOTOGRAPHY
A cross-section of the community
More people can capture a recognisable image using a camera than by creating a painting. Therefore, photographs can reflect the ideas and opinions of many more demographics than painting. Consequently, it is true to say that photography is better at representing mankind as a whole.